ATTORNEY PAUL A. KSICINSKI 414-530-5214
ATTORNEY PAUL A. KSICINSKI
TOP 100 WISCONSIN CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER
​414-530-5214
  • Home
  • References
  • PEER ENDORSEMENTS
  • PAST CASES
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • KNOW YOUR RIGHTS
  • How to deal with police
  • Practice Areas
  • About
  • Criminal Law Links
  • News

Discussion of current legal issues

Henry Nellum case selected by USA Network as a compelling homicide trial to keep an eye on in 2018

Button Text

The correlation between prosecution's violations of the affirmative duty to disclose evidence under Brady and wrongful convictions

2/1/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture

The origin of the prosecution's affirmative duty to disclose evidence favorable to the accused can be traced back to "early 20th‑century strictures against misrepresentation."  Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 432 (1995).  The Supreme Court clarified any misunderstandings about the obligation in 1963 with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83(1963).  In Brady v. Maryland the justices unanimously declared that prosecutors have a constitutional obligation to share with criminal defendants all "exculpatory" evidence officials may have. "Society wins not only when the guilty are convicted but when criminal trials are fair," wrote Justice William O. Douglass, for the Warren Court.  It has long been recognized that withholding exculpatory evidence may impair the “preparation or presentation of the defendant’s case.”  United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 683 (1985).
 
Unfortunately, the government’s duty to disclose favorable evidence to the defense under Brady v. Maryland has become one of the most unenforced constitutional mandates in criminal law.  Cynthia E. Jones, A Reason to Doubt: The Suppression of Evidence and the Inference of Innocence, 100 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 415 (2010).  When it happens, innocent people go to prison, sometimes for extended periods like 25 years.  Chuck Lindell, Judge finds that Anderson hid evidence in Morton murder trial American Statesman (2013) (prosecutor, who became a judge, acted to defraud the trial court and Morton’s defense lawyers, resulting in an innocent man serving almost 25 years in prison.)  Professor Bennett Gershman, the longtime legal scholar, wrote in 2011 that a "prosecutor's violation of the obligation to disclose favorable evidence accounts for more miscarriages of justice than any other type of malpractice, but is rarely sanctioned by courts, and almost never by disciplinary bodies."  Moreover, a prosecutor's actions in withholding exculpatory evidence costs taxpayers.  Dwyer, “Prosecutor Misconduct at a Cost of $3.5 Million,” New York Times, October 22, 2008.
 
There is an undeniable correlation between Brady violations and wrongful convictions.  See, e.g., Government Misconduct, INNOCENCE PROJECT OF MINNESOTA, (finding Brady violations in 37% of 74 wrongful convictions).  The Innocence Network is not alone in identifying and quantifying this alarming correlation.  See, e.g., Lissa Griffin, Innocence and the Suppression of Exculpatory Evidence by Prosecutors, in CONTROVERSIES IN INNOCENCE CASES IN AMERICA, Chap. 5 (Sarah Lucy Cooper ed. 2014) (noting that the second-most “frequent basis for wrongful convictions has been prosecutorial suppression of exculpatory evidence”); N.Y.S. BAR ASS’N, TASK FORCE ON WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS, FINAL REPORT OF THE NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION’S TASK FORCE ON WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS 19, 24-26 (2009) (identifying Brady violations as among the causes of over 50% of fifty-three wrongful convictions and compiling examples of violations); Bennett L. Gershman, Reflections on Brady v. Maryland, 47 S. TEX. L. REV. 685, 686 & n.8 (2006) (cataloging sources finding that “hundreds of convictions have been reversed because of the prosecutor’s suppression of exculpatory evidence.”); Peter A. Joy, The Relationship Between Prosecutorial Misconduct and Wrongful Convictions: Shaping Remedies for a Broken System, 2006 WIS. L. REV. 399, 403 n.20, 425 n.134 (2006) (citing studies linking Brady violations to wrongful convictions)
0 Comments

    Author

    These are reflections I have had about our criminal justice system.  Some of it may make sense, some of it might not.

    Archives

    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.